Working Languages
How to Cite
Downloads
Abstract
Objectives: Understanding some factors affecting the satisfaction of nursing leaners for training activities of Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital in 2022.
Subjects and methods: The cross-sectional study design will be carried out in 2022 on 199 nursing learners (including full-time students and continuing training students) studying at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. The questionnaire to assess student satisfaction was developed by the author based on the ISO:9001 process questionnaire of the Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital and the SEEQ questionnaire. Using direct interview method to collect research data.
Results: 04 factors were identified related to student satisfaction, including: Lecturers; Education program; Work environment; Evaluate the learning process. The regression equation predicting the variation of overall satisfaction with the course based on the above 04 independent variables has the form: Y = 1.077 + 0.341*X1 + 0.137*X2 + 0.134*X3 + 0.112*X.4. However, these independent variables only explain 57.5% of the variation in overall satisfaction with the course.
Conclusion: This research can be used to design intervention programs to improve nursing learners’ satisfaction. In addition, it is necessary to continue studying other factors that affect the satisfaction of nursing learners.
Keywords
References
Rauyruen P. and Miller K.E. (2007). Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.11.006
Löfmark A., Thorkildsen K., Råholm M.-B., et al. (2012). Nursing students’ satisfaction with supervision from preceptors and teachers during clinical practice. Nurse Educ Pract, 12(3), 164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2011.12.005.
Papathanasiou I.V., Tsaras K., and Sarafis P. (2014). Views and perceptions of nursing students on their clinical learning environment: teaching and learning. Nurse Educ Today, 34(1), 57–60. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.007
Payne C. (2016). Transitions into practice: First patient care experiences of baccalaureate nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 16(1), 251–257.doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.09.011
Movahedi A.F., Yousefpour M., and Sadeghi S. (2013). Comparison of teaching behaviors of clinical nursing instructors from the perspective of nursing students of the public and private Universities of Semnan in 2012. Journal of Medical Education and Development, 8(3), 81–95.
Amini A., Bayat R., and Amini K (2020). Barriers to Clinical Education from the Perspective of Nursing Students in Iran: An Integrative Review. Archives of Pharmacy Practice, Volume.11, Issue 1.
Amoo S.A., Aderoju Y.B.G., Sarfo-Walters R., et al. (2022). Nursing Students’ Perception of Clinical Teaching and Learning in Ghana: A Descriptive Qualitative Study. Nurs Res Pract, 2022. doi: 10.1155/2022/7222196
Mahmoodreza Tavakoli, , Tahereh Khazaei, , Maryam Tolyat, et al. (2014). The Quality of clinical education from the viewpoints of students and instructors of paramedical and nursing-obstetrics schools of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Daneshvar Medicine, 22(1), 41–48.
El Ansari W. and Oskrochi R. (2004). What “really” affects health professions students’ satisfaction with their educational experience? Implications for practice and research. Nurse Educ Today, 24(8), 644–655. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2004.09.002.
Milton-Wildey K., Kenny P., Parmenter G., et al. (2014). Educational preparation for clinical nursing: the satisfaction of students and new graduates from two Australian universities. Nurse Educ Today, 34(4), 648–654. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.004.
Salamonson Y., Everett B., Halcomb E., et al. (2015). Unravelling the complexities of nursing students’ feedback on the clinical learning environment: a mixed methods approach. Nurse Educ Today, 35(1), 206–211. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.005
Fernández-García D., Giménez-Espert M.D.C., Castellano-Rioja E., et al. (2020). What Academic Factors Influence Satisfaction With Clinical Practice in Nursing Students? Regressions vs. fsQCA. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585826.
Ruiz-Grao M.C., Cebada-Sánchez S., Ortega-Martínez C., et al. (2022). Nursing Student Satisfaction with the Teaching Methodology Followed during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Healthcare (Basel), 10(4), 597. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040597.
Fernández-García D., Moreno-Latorre E., Giménez-Espert M. del C., et al. (2021). Satisfaction with the clinical practice among nursing students using regression models and qualitative comparative analysis. Nurse Education Today, 100, 104861. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104861.
Vũ Thị Thu Hằng, Nguyễn Thị Phương Lan, Nguyễn Văn Thắng, et al. Khảo sát sự hài lòng của người học về dịch vụ đào tạo tại trường Đại học Y – Dược Thái Nguyên. Tạp chí Y học dự phòng, 31(2), 67–72.
Mai T.Y., Nguyễn T.M.C., Vũ T.T.M., et al. (2018). Khảo sát sự hài lòng của sinh viên điều dưỡng sau học thực hành mô phỏng tại Trung tâm Tiền lâm sàng Trường Đại học Điều dưỡng Nam Định. Tạp chí Khoa học Điều dưỡng, 1(1), 94–101.
Marsh H.W. (1982). SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students’ evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1982.tb02505.x
Akram A.S., Mohamad A., and Akram S. The Role of Clinical Instructor in Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in Nursing Education. International Journal of Caring Sciences, Volume 11, Issue 2, Page 876-882.
Depoo L., Urbancova H., Smolova H., et al. (2016). Students’ evaluation of education quality in human resource management area: case of private czech university. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, Volume 9, no 2, page 45-51.
Webster A., Bowron C., Matthew-Maich N., et al. (2016). The effect of nursing staff on student learning in the clinical setting. Nurs Stand, 30(40), 40–47. DOI: 10.7748/ns.30.40.40.s44
Horii S., Nguyen C.T.M., Pham H.T.T., et al. (2021). Effectiveness of a standard clinical training program in new graduate nurses’ competencies in Vietnam: A quasi-experimental longitudinal study with a difference-in-differences design. PLoS One, 16(7), e0254238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254238.
Xu F., Ma L., Wang Y., et al. (2021). Effects of an Innovative Training Program for New Graduate Registered Nurses: A Comparison Study. SAGE Open, 11(1), 2158244020988542. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020988542
Papastavrou E., Dimitriadou M., Tsangari H., et al. (2016). Nursing students’ satisfaction of the clinical learning environment: a research study. BMC Nurs, 15, 44(2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0164-4
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Nursing Science